Prediction of Justin Engel [347th] vs Jerome Kym [132nd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L W W L L L
Form
W L W L L W L L L WHead-To-Head: Engel 1 - 1 Kym
They have played 5 sets in total, with Engel winning 2 and Kym winning 3. The last match between Engel and Kym was at the Villena Challenger, 04-10-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Jerome Kym getting the victory 6-2 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Justin Engel | 1 |
| Jerome Kym | 1 |
| Engel | Stats | Kym |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (11-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (2-4) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 347 | Ranking | 132 |
| 345 | Highest Rank | 129 |
| 17 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 5 |
| 57% (63-48) | Career Total W/L | 67% (133-65) |
| $18,195 | Career Prize Money | $93,710 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Jerome Kym
Player
Justin Engel
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Jerome Kym
54%
(
53 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
35%
(
16 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 23 | Games Won | 25 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:44:10 | Average Match Time | 1:44:10 |
| 56% (95/170) | 1st Serve % | 66% (84/127) |
| 79% (75/95) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (65/84) |
| 37% (28/75) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (24/43) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (5/13) |
| 30% (38/127) | Return Points Win % | 39% (67/170) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Justin Engel vs Jerome Kym Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Engel 1 - 1 Kym
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Engel has won 45.81% of points on their second serve, while Kym has won 46.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Engel, in recent form, has won 44.93% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kym has won 42.86%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.82% and 23.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Engel has saved 52.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kym has saved 55.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Engel has won 66.18% of matches played (W/L 45/ 23), with Kym winning 71.83% (W/L 51/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Engel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 49/ 34), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6). Kym has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 32/ 11), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 19/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Engel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 87.8% of matches (W/L 36/ 5), where as Kym has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.34% of matches (W/L 34/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Engel winning 1 times and Kym being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Engel winning 2 and Kym winning 3. The last match between Engel and Kym was at the Villena Challenger, 04-10-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Jerome Kym getting the victory 6-2 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:10.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Engel and Kym have played a deciding set 1 times, with Engel winning 1 times and Kym 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Engel winning 0, and Kym 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Engel has played against opponents with an average rank of 330.68 while Kym has played against players with an average rank of 289.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Engel has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kym has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Engel has converted 38.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kym has converted 25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Justin Engel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Justin Engel
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Justin Engel
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
112)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
46 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
112)
113
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Justin Engel
66%
(
75 of
114)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
49 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Daniel Cukierman
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(2) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Lucas Bouquet
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Justin Engel
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Justin Engel
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
11 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Andre Ilagan
57%
(
64 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
11
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
48 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(10) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alberto Bronzetti
Player
Justin Engel
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Justin Engel
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jerome Kym Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Patrick Zahraj
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
74%
(
58 of
78)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Jerome Kym
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
7
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Jerome Kym
55%
(
63 of
114)
1st Serve %
55%
(
61 of
110)
5
Aces
19
8
Double Faults
6
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(0) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Jerome Kym
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
13
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
6
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kei Nishikori
Player
Jerome Kym
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Engel vs Kym?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Engel Vs Kym is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (63/48) | Win/Loss | 67% (133/65) |
| 55% (140/116) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (294/162) |
| 52% (1235/1143) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2451/1971) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.64 |
| 456 | Aces Total | 1390 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 318 | Total Double Faults | 497 |
| 1:20:41 | Average Match Time | 1:43:36 |
| 373.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 371.78 |
| 59% (3887/6579) | 1st Serve % | 64% (8521/13393) |
| 68% (2661/3887) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (6332/8521) |
| 49% (1314/2692) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2441/4872) |
| 45% (274/605) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (594/1421) |
| 40% (2469/6186) | Return Points Win % | 41% (5743/14162) |
| 57% (63/111) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (133/196) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (14/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (52/89) |
| 59% (20/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (34/62) |
| 88% (60/53) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (132/117) |
| 12% (60/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (132/15) |
| 20% (51/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (66/16) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
